Tuesday, December 29, 2009

2010 Ford Focus SE, Other Car Happenings

Hi everyone,

The past few days have been awesome, but busy. On Christmas, I found an envelope with a ticket to Detroit in mid-January...so I'm headed to NAIAS 2010! I'm setting up for some great connections while I'm there, so expect live posting from the show floor (if I can figure it out), and plenty of extra media will be available shortly after that. I also had the opportunity to test drive a 2010 Ford Focus SE at a local Ford dealer. I walked in with the intention of having a look at the 2010 Mustang GT, but that would hardly be a practical car for me, or even the average car buyer. The dealer would also prefer that you don't look directly at it unless you show them $35,000...they're a little protective of it, but that's somewhat beside the point. I suppose I would be the same way if I were a salesman. Can't have people coming in for a joyride when it best suits them. Don't get me wrong, the Mustang GT is a fantastic car, but it isn't nearly as versatile as the Focus.


A few years ago, my dad had essentially the same Focus as what I drove the other day. He had a blue 2004 Ford Focus SE with a few simple options; it had power locks and windows, cruise control, and keyless entry. Nothing fancy, but it was a good car. It had a 2.0L Zetec I4 engine (I know that sounds technical...it just means the engine was pretty average for a car of that size), a 5-speed manual transmission, and fwd (front-wheel-drive; the wheels that received power were the front ones). The engine was quite flexible; it had plenty of power when you wanted it, but it also could yield something like 34 mpg on the highway. The steering was also fantastically direct, with no slack on-center, so if you turned the wheel a tiny bit, the car would turn a tiny bit immediately. There were a few cons to the car, though. It may have been advertised as a 5-seater, but Ford probably just wrote 5 to avoid the hassle of having to explain that you can fit only two children in the back seat comfortably. And this is if they're shorter than 5 feet tall. If they were taller, they had to sit cross-legged, or risk the inevitable circulation loss in their legs when they tried to fit them in between the front and rear seats. And don't even get me started on the horizontal challenge of fitting even 3 children in the backseat. It's not pretty, or comfortable. All-in-all, the car was good, reliable transportation at a decent price, and that's what it was marketed as, so Ford did their job. When 2005 rolled in, so did a restyled Focus. I thought it looked a little ugly, but it sold well despite this. I assume the functionality of the 2005 model was at least on par with, if not greater than the previous model.

Well, now we're almost to 2010, and the automotive companies are swimming for dear life amidst this economic downturn. Among those swimmers, Ford Motor Company has appeared to be Michael Phelps at times. I saw on chart in Motor Trend which suggested that Ford was the only major U.S. seller (including import giant Toyota) to post a profit for a specific quarter. I'll have to look more closely at Ford's earnings, as I've heard that their profits cannot be attributed to car sales, but they're still among the financially stronger automakers. Volkswagen also posted a profit in that quarter, but the companies who made money were few and far between. Just look at G.M. and Chrysler, both of whom were financially ground upon the rocks, pleading for government bailouts, and parading in front of government panels to explain the intended path out of the financial storm. So why was Ford able to stay out of all this? Well, not having immediate access to Ford's sales and net income, I can't exactly say where the money was made...or rather, not lost. But even if sales were down, and profits were not made there, I can speculate that it's at least partially because of brilliant vehicles. Let's have a look at one of these vehicles.


The 2010 Ford Focus SE. This is a mid-level Focus. I tested a black model with a 5 speed manual and a 2.0L I4, which would punch your wallet to the tune of roughly $19,000. If you're on a tighter budget, a base Focus can be had for $15,995. One of the first things you'll notice about a newer Focus is the aggressive-looking yet compact fascia. The back end tells the same story, with stylish, unique taillights, and a nicely sculpted small car body in between which rides 15" alloy wheels. Quite elegant, really. Much less outlandish than the current Toyota Corolla, which is a competitor. The styling is also much fresher than that of the Chevrolet Cobalt, another competitor that has remained mainly unchanged for a few years. So the Focus has a nice edge in style, but a car like this isn't purchased purely for style. The basic roles which all previous Focuses had to fill still had to be filled by the 2010 model. So what about the interior? Everything is easy to understand, with simple, easy-to-reach controls, and telescoping everything you could imagine. That's especially helpful if I want to drive the Focus after my mother, who is half a foot shorter than I am. The interior looks good, but I had some preconceived notions of the rear seat space. I didn't have three adults to test with, but the back seat room appears to have increased, despite the deceptively small exterior. A pleasant surprise was waiting in the trunk when I opened it. An 8" subwoofer, which is part of the 8 speaker, 190 watt premium sound system. This system is also MP3 player capable. Just in case you were wondering, 190 watts of stereo is plenty. The system puts out great thumping bass, and the high treble notes are crystal-clear. I wasn't expecting something that nice from the Focus. My only gripe here is that there is less trunk space. Normally I wouldn't care, but I'm sure my cello would not fit in the trunk. Regardless, most people don't have to worry about a cello, and the trunk should suit everyday things like groceries. Another nice feature was SIRIUS satellite radio, though I didn't use it in my limited time. The controls for all of this were made of nice, soft-to-the-touch materials in the center console, though there was also a plethora of steering wheel controls which I didn't bother to figure out. Quite an impressive improvement from the interior from older models, and better than many Chevrolet compact rentals that I've been in.

Driving. Ah, the good part. No matter who you are, it's unlikely that you want a boring car. If you can have a little excitement for the same amount of money, why not? Exactly. This is where I, being an 18 year old car fanatic, am most impressed. The shifter is fine, with easy throws and solid chunky notches to let you know which gear you're in. The engine purrs quietly when idling, and there's very little vibration. Unless you're very still, the only real indication that the car is running is the tachometer, with the needle hovering around 750 rpm. The second I pulled out of the dealer, I knew something was different about this Focus. VERY different. There was some uneven ground, maybe even a pothole between the dealer lot and the street, and I had driven towards it expecting a wobbly bump. It might as well have been a wide crevasse, because the Focus felt incredibly planted. Great, the car feels planted over small bumps at 5mph...that doesn't really give you a great idea of the handing though, does it? Something the salesman had mentioned before the drive is that the Focus has "European inspired suspension." I haven't the faintest idea of what that means. Maybe they're attempting to emulate a nicer German car, like a BMW, Audi, or Mercedes? I couldn't tell you. But I know this; that car feels bolted to the road. That doesn't mean the ride is bad, though. Bumps, potholes, and the occasional Mariana Trench that have become commonplace on Maine roads? The Focus laughs at them. The ride is compliant enough to deal with these, but sporty enough for anyone who doesn't intend to take their car to a racetrack. My dad has a Lincoln Continental with electronically controlled air suspension, and the Focus feels more composed over bumps. Similarly, the 2004 Focus feels like Jell-O in comparison. It's amazing how quickly technology progresses. The engine is easily capable of putting a grin on your face, both on the streets and at the pump.

As a relatively inexpensive, all around fun and functional vehicle, the Focus is a phenomenal deal. The Focus appeals to a wide range of buyers, from first car owners, to those looking for a reliable family car. The Focus is widely customizable, and can even be had in a sportier coupe model with a more performance-oriented drive train, and revised styling all-around. Sadly, the U.S. won't be getting the incredibly sporty RS version of the Focus which embarrasses the mighty Mustang GT from time to time. I'll console myself with the amazing all around purpose and ability of the normal model range of the Focus. For a rating of performance, value, ease-of-use, aesthetics, and comparison to other vehicles in its class, I'll give the Focus a rating based on a ten star system. Only the most mind-blowing vehicles receive a 10, and the worst vehicles would receive a 1...maybe a 0 if it was truly despicable. The Focus fared quite well in my hands, so I'll give it a rating of 8.5 out of 10.

Thanks for reading, I'll be sure to keep everyone posted on the upcoming show in Detroit!
-Stephen

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Worst 5 Cars

Hey everyone,

The list is back. But this time, it's bad. Of course, this is all a very opinionated subject, so make of it what you will. Yes, I know I said I'll finish my list of the top ten cars, but I thought I'd balance my current list of five great cars with a list of five bad cars. These cars aren't bad on all fronts, or they would never have been thought of, let alone marketed. But they aren't good, so they must be bad. I'll explain as I run through the list.

1. Hummer H1, H2, H2 SUT, H3, H3 Alpha, etc. Well this probably isn’t a huge surprise to some of you. Imagine that, a Hummer on the "worst cars" list! The simple fact of the matter is, Hummers are not civilian vehicles. Though you can go into the fact that they need more armor for many military operations, it can't be said that they make reasonable rides for the "average Joe." Why? There are a number of reasons. Hummers have terrible fuel economy. In another blog, I'll explain why how you drive is what really determines fuel economy, instead of what you drive. The problem is, that simply isn't the case with a Hummer. Yes, you can get your fuel economy to go below the standard dismal rating, but it'll be hard to get more than say, 13mpg to 14mpg in an H2, which is one of the larger models. To put that in perspective, the fuel economy standard in the great U.S. of A has hovered around 20mpg for roughly half a century. But whats that you say? You'd like a smaller Hummer? Well how about the H3? It has a standard inline 5 cylinder engine (fewer cylinders than my dad's minivan), so it should get great fuel economy, right? WRONG. It'll get an EPA fuel economy rating of 14mpg in the city, 18mpg on the highway. So the Hummer has abysmal fuel economy...but does that really matter? Maybe people buy Hummers for the performance. Somehow I don't think that's it. They're very slow to accelerate, and they cannot turn quickly. Think about a 6,000 lb. brick on wheels, and you have the idea. The average Hummer driver might just want to appear wealthy, macho, or sophisticated. Now before I bash all Hummer drivers completely, I’d like to mention that the Hummer is a fantastic off-road, all terrain vehicle. It was designed that way for the military, and it does well there. The Hummer was not created to be an ego boost for civilians who wish to play G.I. Joe or Jane. This is a good example of a car becoming nearly pointless when it switches markets. But hey, if it sold, Hummer would offer it to non-military personnel. Of course, now it’s gone. Yes, the iconic Hummer brand has been sold to China. G.M. got rid of Hummer for some money, and a nicer reputation regarding the environment.

2. Smart ForTwo. I first saw this car at the NAIAS 2007. I thought it was an interesting new idea with a fair amount of potential, and I happily found that I fit into the driver’s seat with little (ha, ha) trouble. Then it came out, and Car and Driver tested it, among other publications. For some ridiculous reason which I could not (and still cannot) figure out, the Smart ForTwo gets only 3mpg more than my mother’s Toyota Corolla on the highway. That’s right. My mother’s car, with an engine nearly three times larger than that of the ForTwo, gets nearly the same fuel economy. Oh, and my mom’s car can seat three more people, so it’s actually more efficient per-person. If the Smart were reasonably fast, I might think the fuel economy was alright…but it isn’t. After I got over its inefficiency, I found that an interesting speech impediment had come over every person who had tried to speak to me about the car. I kept hearing the phrase “Smart car.” It could be that I’m very out of the automotive loop, and I’ve simply never known this to be a correct term, but that’s kind of like saying “Oh yeah, I drive a Ford car.” “Car” IS NOT in the name of the Smart ForTwo. I just wanted to clear that up. The Smart ForTwo, just like the Hummer, is a statement of personality for most people. And that’s okay, but I think a car needs to be more than just a statement. That’s like art for the sake of art. I like my art to have purpose, and my cars to have multi-faceted areas of unique goodness.

3. Chevrolet Aveo. I’m not going to go into much detail here. Suffice it to say, the people at Chevrolet accidentally received a shipment of weed-wacker engines. Rather than return them, Chevy decided to build a car around this engine. Ta-da! The Aveo was born. Insult to America as it is, some people find it practical. It is incredibly inexpensive (as far as new cars go), and it does all of the basic functions you’d expect from a car. Well, it stops, and it turns. Apparently Chevy forgot one crucial part for the car. With that weed-wacker engine, it doesn't go. Alright, I’m mostly kidding, but the Aveo can be quite difficult to merge onto a highway. It has 103hp. For comparison, the engine in my mother’s fuel efficient Corolla has 125hp. That’s an 18% difference in power, and when your car has very little power, every bit counts. The Aveo just doesn’t have every bit.

4. Dodge Avenger. This car isn’t really bad in one specific area. Rather, it’s mediocre in every aspect I’ve seen. A car like that could really jeopardize a company like Dodge…and it did. I don’t know how much of Dodge’s hideous financial state can be attributed to this car, but I have a feeling that Dodge lost a lot of money because of it. The car has a whiney but weak engine, the fuel economy is lower than you’d expect for something so weak, the reliability record is generally poor, and the interior plastics and materials would be much more at home in a dreary jail cell, or a LEGO box. They just don't feel nice, and the colors are unimaginative. I honestly can’t think of one thing that is appealing about the Avenger. I suppose I’ll leave it with my kindest honest words; at least it’s not an ugly car.

5. Pontiac Aztek. YES, it is the one you had a nightmare about. And it’s UGLY. I can’t even explain how ugly it is. It sold terribly, would you like to know why? Take a look: http://www.dumpitinthepump.com/auto_images/Pontiac-Aztek.jpg
Yes, that’s a car. The saddest part (besides Pontiac’s tricking of the probable mass of blind people who were duped into purchasing the most hideous thing they’d ever not seen) is that the face isn’t out of the ordinary for the Aztek. Everything in the car is pretty much bad…the fuel economy, the performance, the looks, the fit-and-finish, the looks, the price, the looks, and so on. The previous car was just mediocre all-around. The Aztek, however, is the one who takes the cake for all-around indecency to the name of automobiles and their respective manufacturers. If you ever wonder why Pontiac got the axe when the going got tough for G.M., have a little reminder with this car.

I hope everyone who has vacation is still enjoying it, and have a Merry Christmas, or whatever holiday you celebrate!

-Stephen

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Big Plans, Top 5

Hi again,

It's pretty late, but I'm not very tired, so I'll let everyone in on some of the new stuff I'm working on. For starters, NAIAS attendance is looking more and more probable daily. Something else that I'm working on right now is creating a mobile site...and not just for smartphones. If you have a phone, and you don't mind the quite-possibly-astronomical prices of going online, then you'll be able to get news from here whenever you want. That may not sound all that special right now, but when I'm out on the show floor in Detroit posting live from my iPhone, it'll be interesting to be able to get content immediately. Once I get a definite answer for the auto show, I'll send out a message to everyone in the Facebook group (which is this: http://www.facebook.com/inbox/?folder=[fb]messages&page=1&tid=1065501653823#/group.php?gid=246465348781&ref=ts )letting everyone know the plans. I try to avoid many messages, because I've always hated those groups that send you lots of messages. That's not the point. I'd like the people who are interested to read and find this on their own. I'm just going to provide a solid chance for people to find me, and I think adding a mobile site as well as an NAIAS trip will drastically increase reader numbers as well as interest.

Before I head to bed, I think I'll mention something that one of my friends asked me about, namely, which ten cars would I buy if I had the money? This question is often answered in interesting ways. When I've heard this topic brought up, the involved parties have been my age. This means they tend to drive their parent's cars...of course, a few people have their own nice cars before they're out of high school. But most of that is beside the point: some people want 10 Priuses, or nine and a bike. Others want whatever their parents have, but throughout a certain model range. Who are the most interesting people to answer, or attempt to answer this question? The ones who CERTAINLY can't name 5 cars, let alone ten. Now, that's nothing to be ashamed of, though it may require slight ignorance in today's society. Oddly enough, I don't fall into any of these categories. I'm in the slim category of people who love cars, and have a list ready whenever the aforementioned question is posed. So, I'll try to remember them, though I must admit that my list is subject to frequent change:

1. Saleen S7 Twin Turbo. Why? It's absurdly fast.It's the second fastest production/street legal vehicle in the world, to the Bugatti Veyron...unless the Koenigseggs are mass produced. I don't know a whole lot about those. Speed alone won't win on my list, though. This car has an idle that makes motorcycle gangs and Jason Statham cry and then run. Of course, it also happens to be ridiculously gorgeous. And no, it certainly isn't practical, that would defeat the purpose of such a car.

2. An '05 or newer Ford Mustang GT. If any car fanatics are reading this, they most likely think I have no credibility. After all, I have a $585,000 (base price) car at my #1 spot, then my #2 car is roughly $25,000 (base as well). Think whatever you want, this is my list. The Mustang GT offers amazing performance for nearly unmatched price. Yeah yeah, the new Nissan 370Z is a tiny bit faster, but that doesn't matter. The Z has a V6, and sounds whiny next to the deep, throaty gurgle which emanates from the Mustang's 4.6L V8. The Mustang sounds mean, but in a good way. Then there's the styling. It looks great in most colors, except for black. If you decide to get a black Mustang, you're in for something better than great. It looks downright sinister. It's a muscle car, menacing and fast at times, and then it can be a nice family car or highway cruiser, provided you don't have a family of greater than 4, and you don't mind a bit of resonating V8 noise.

3. A 2010 BMW M3. This car is touted to have it all: power, refinement, speed, beauty, utility, reliability, and the inevitable classiness of a BMW. The 414hp V8 moves the car phenomenally, and there are as many safety, luxury, and standard features as you could ever want in a BMW costing under $100,000. Just a fantastic all around car. If I had to be realistic, I'd choose this car over all of the others.

4. 2010 Mazda Miata. A number of people think this is a rather "girly" car. The thought must be founded somewhere, as most stereotypes are, but I'm not quite sure what "girly" entails, when in a car. The Miata has a rev-happy engine, sporty chassis, and smooth gearbox. It's not particularly powerful, but it's fun to drive. It's not always about the speed, so long as your ride makes you grin.

5. 2009 Dodge Viper. What list would be complete without an absolutely ludicrous vehicle? If you read about the first car...you might notice there are actually two absolutely ludicrous vehicles in this list. I couldn't resist. The Viper is just the kind of car that everybody knows the name of. It's the car that some children have on posters on their walls. It's like a Corvette, but meaner, and scarier. All of these things make it an iconic American sports car, and I'd be thrilled (and terrified) to own one. For those of you who don't know, the Viper has a huge engine, and it's very fast. It's also difficult to control at the limit, so the driver has to know what he or she is doing, or the Viper bites back. But I'm willing to bet that it's extremely fun to drive, if just for the V10 roar and the awestruck look of bystanders. If I had absolutely no need for practicality, this would be my top choice.

I said I'd give you the top 10, but it took me quite a while to write all that...and I am tired now. If many people are interested, I'll post something about the others on my top 10 list sometime soon.

Thanks for reading!

-Stephen

Friday, December 18, 2009

Hey everyone,

Sorry about the lapse in posts, I was originally trying to post twice weekly...once on the weekend, and once in the middle of the week. I realized that my teachers sporadically attempt to overwhelm me with work, and posting in the middle of the week may be difficult from time to time. I'll try to post on a somewhat regular basis, but I can't really promise perfect punctuality until teachers stop giving homework.

Now that I've gotten through that, I'm just gonna mention that we're ON VACATION! I thought I'd never make it, this last week was definitely more than five school day long.

I'm going to fill you in on a little secret which few of you will probably care about: though you or your benefactor (parent) probably always feel as though you're being robbed at the pump, the oil companies decide that "'tis the season!" to charge you even more. No, the prices don't actually fluctuate more than usual in the winter, but the power you get from your gas does. The average gallon of winter gasoline contains about 112,500 Btu (British thermal units, a measurement of energy). A gallon of gasoline purchased in the summer has roughly 2,000 Btu more. Sadly, you can't do anything to change that. If you are looking for many or any tips to get the most of your money for gas, I have a few little-known ideas which I read a few years ago...fantastic stuff, if you're into saving money, and maybe your car's longevity.

I'll eventually come up with consistent material of my own, but as I've said, topics that you readers want to hear about are what I want to write about. I guess the biggest news is that there's a solid chance that I'll be able to find enough time to get up to the Detroit auto show (NAIAS) in January. If I do, I'll have absurd amounts of media and stories to post. The last NAIAS I went to was the 2008 show, and I took something like 900 pictures, and 40 videos. This, of course, was for me alone. If I end up going, I'll be taking requests for media and info on any and all makes, models, concepts, and technology.

Did anyone else find it odd that we had a 60 degree day followed closely by some weather in the 20s? My views of global warming on the whole have flip-flopped from time to time, but that sort of temperature variation so late in the year is the sort of thing that makes skeptics wonder who's telling the truth, or how much it's stretched. As it has gotten colder, I've realized one nice benefit: the colder air is denser, so I get a significant increase in power. When you're driving a car as tiny as the Corolla (which has, as I mentioned, only 125 horsepower) it's great to get a 5 to 7 horsepower jump. If anybody knows much about turbochargers, you know that an intercooler does. The function of the intercooler is exactly as it sounds: it cools the air, making it more dense. This allows for more complete burning of the air-fuel mixture, which yields more power. Other than that little bit of extra power though, I'd rather weather above 5 degrees. This vacation should give me some time to think of less random topics, and answer any questions people have.
Just giving you a preview of things to come, I'm sure interesting stuff will appear over the next two weeks. Also, if you're at all interested in running, you might wish to check out this other blog: http://tocomeagaintobelfast.blogspot.com/

Thanks to everyone who read this, I'll certainly be posting some new material soon. NAIAS 2007 pictures are likely to follow, and trust me, they're awesome. I just need to figure out if there's an easier way to get the files; scanning 350 pictures could take a while, though it'd be worth it. If it snows, check here, I'll delve into one of my favorite subjects which relate to cars. Happy holidays, I hope everyone will enjoy their vacation!

-Stephen

Saturday, December 12, 2009

A Brief Background

Hey everyone, I'm Stephen. I'm assuming the first people to read this already know me, but I'm very into cars. This is just a way to get my name out, I'm hoping to someday have a career along the lines of an automotive journalist. That's obviously a while in the future, but I enjoy writing on most subjects that relate to cars in any way, so this should be a fun way to get a head start on the competition.
Since this is mainly about cars, I'll fill everyone in on my car background, and what I intend to cover in this blog, though I'm sure the purpose and posts will vary as time passes. I've been somewhat of a car fanatic since just before January 2004. I was driving to Toronto with my family for a New Year reunion, and we stopped at one of those ridiculously well-outfitted rest stops...the ones that have many restaurants, and at least one Hudson News store. I wanted to do some reading on the long drive, so I bought an issue of Car and Driver. The rest, as they say, is history. After a fantastic vacation in Toronto (where, oddly enough, none of my relatives live...it must have been a viable meeting point because many of them live in Michigan) I subscribed to Car and Driver. Since then, I have subscribed to Motor Trend, MPH, Super Street, and a number of other car magazines. The only continued subscription has been Car and Driver, for their mix of humor, information, and the way in which they explain the cars they test. I enjoy driving, and I have a decent choice of vehicles upon which to base my thoughts of car performance and purpose. My mom has a 2001 Toyota Corolla with a 1.8L, 125hp inline 4...maybe an LE model, but I'll check later. My dad has a 2002 Lincoln Continental with a 4.6L, 275hp V8. My dad also has a 2000 Ford Windstar with a 3.8L, 200hp V6. That's a decent list of options, because the Corolla is classified as a compact car, the Continental as a midsize luxury car, and the Windstar as, well, a minivan. Oddly enough, despite the far superior acceleration and comfort of the Continental, I enjoy driving the Corolla the most. It's so simple that it feels like an extension of the driver, and you don't have to wait for it to respond. It's light and reliable, and it handles simply. At the limit, it understeers as most FWD (front-wheel-drive) cars will. And the power isn't fantastic, but the engine is willing to do what you ask, and it returns great fuel economy when it's driven normally: up to 38 mpg.

It's already fairly late at night, and I'm hanging out at Will's house as I try to write this, so I'm sure I'll forget important things which should be mentioned in the first post of a blog, but I at least want to make this post. Something I should do, just to fill in the average non-car-obsessed person, is create a basic list of terms and abbreviations that I'll use to save time in future posts. If I forget to mention a term now, I'll try attempt to remember to define it when I use it. And of course, questions about anything relating to posts (or cars in general) will always be welcome. If you think you know a fair bit about cars...or even just the basics, you might want to save some time and skip over this next section. Alright, here goes for the list:
hp: Horsepower
lb-ft: a measurement of torque, which is the twisting power of an engine
DOHC: Double Overhead Cams (the camshaft is what controls the intake and exhaust valves of your engine...I'll go into more detail with that later as well)
SOHC: Single Overhead Cams
Cylinder: The chamber in which the gasoline explodes in an engine
I4, I6, V6, V8, V10, V12, V16, etc.: The layout of the cylinders of an engine
Piston: The metal device that fits inside the cylinder, and is driven down by the explosion. I'm hoping most people that read this will know that.
Hybrid: Any vehicle that has two methods of drive, such as an electric motor and a gasoline engine. I'm guessing you've heard of the Prius?
Supercar: Any vehicle which may be outrageously pointless except for incredible performance. And when I say performance, I mean speed and handling, not miles-per-gallon.
MPG: miles per gallon. The average distance that any vehicle can travel on a single gallon of fuel.

Now that I've gone through a basic list of terms, I think I'm done with this post. For anyone who is wondering, Will has just annihilated Patrick with a score of 20 to 6 in Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. I'm going to join in the fun for a few minutes before I head home. If you read this far, I'm sorry you have so much free time...just kidding. I appreciate readers, if you have any questions, comments, or new ideas for anything, please let me know. I'll update this fairly frequently (no, not hourly, but weekly) so I'll get something interesting out here sometime soon. Thanks for reading, I'll catch y'all soon.


-Stephen